注册时间2004-3-1
最后登录1970-1-1
在线时间 小时
主题
精华
积分2745
贡献
ST
道具劵
|
马上登陆,参与交流。无法注册或登陆请加QQ群:777694204 或Email:admin@cnkeyboard.net
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册
x
Well, it really is a matter of opinion, but, I would have to say that the p60 would be a better choice than the PX100.
I went to a music store and the p60 and px100 were side by side. I have to say that even though the Casio has 2 or 3 layers of piano sound, it was less expressive than the p60, which has only 1 layer of piano sound.
Now, the key feel. The "Key to sound" connection on both are not very good, but the p60 I would say has the better connection. The action on the PX100 is plasticky and mushy, and the dynamics are horrendous.
The polyphony on both is 32 notes. Both have 10 preset sounds. I would have to say that overall, the p60 has higher quality voices than the PX100, because the p60 uses AWM stereo sampling technology, which is better than casio's so-called "HL Sound Source" technology.
Well, thats my review. I did try them side by side, so I know. I still have to say that the p60 beats the PX100 in Piano sound and feel, but thats opinion, so you would have to try it for yourself. I hope this helped.
p120dUdE
Owner, West Brook Music Studio
这确实是很主观的事,但我不得不说,相比PX100,P60是更好的选择。
我去的乐器店,P60和PX100并排放在那里。我认为,即使PX100有2或3层钢琴采样,对比P60的只有一层采样,它还是缺少表现力。
再说键感,在“键到音符”的连接上,二者都不是太好,但P60更好一点。PX100的键子有塑料感,感觉比较糊,动态也很“可怕”。
复音数都是32,都是10个预置音色。总体上说,P60的音色质量更高一些,因为P60采用AWM立体声采样,CASIO采用的是所谓的"HL Sound Source"技术。
以上是我的评价,我确实是做了side by side对比。我还是认为P60的钢琴音色和键感要好于PX100。你最好是亲自去试试。
原贴地址:
http://acapella.harmony-central. ... php?threadid=622407 |
|